Podcasts & RSS Feeds
Most Active Stories
- Listen: Can You Pick Out The Northwest Accent? (And Yes, We Have One!)
- Former Boeing Executive Alan Mulally’s Advice On Labor: 'Working Together Works’
- Tips On Staying Healthy While You Travel
- Mass: Expect Intensifying Rains With Global Warming
- Just Back From Spain, Nancy Leson Offers A Few Pointers On Paella
News & Music Contributors
Fri March 14, 2014
Canada, U.S. Disagree Over Value of Columbia River Treaty Benefits
British Columbia has staked out a negotiating position on a cross-border water treaty that puts it at odds with public utilities and ratepayers in the U.S. Northwest. At issue is whether and how to renew the 50-year-old Columbia River Treaty.
U.S. utilities argue we're paying Canada too much to manage water flows from upstream reservoirs. But the negotiating principles finalized by British Columbia this week imply the U.S. actually undervalues the benefits it receives.
“The British Columbia position and the regional recommendation from the U.S. side are seeing those things a little differently and analyzed those differently,” said Scott Corwin, who directs a Portland-based regional public power industry association. “What we'd like to see is the United States expeditiously move into that discussion and try to work through that."
By treaty, British Columbia receives a portion of the electricity generated from American dams on the shared Columbia River. That's worth several hundred million dollars, which might otherwise accrue to Northwest ratepayers.
Under the terms of the Columbia River Treaty, either party can give notice to terminate beginning later this year. But an extended negotiation between Washington and Ottawa seems more likely at this stage.
Columbia River Treaty
Columbia River Dams