Podcasts & RSS Feeds
Most Active Stories
- UW's MOOC On Public Speaking Proving To Be Massively Popular
- Seattle Business Owners: $15 Minimum Wage Could Prove 'Possibly Fatal'
- UW Professor Traces Growing Income Gap To The Collapse Of Organized Labor
- How To Make Your Own Crème Fraîche — And Why You Should
- No Need To Presoak Beans For This Cheese Rind-Flavored Minestrone Recipe
News & Music Contributors
HANFORD NUCLEAR RESERVATION
Fri October 18, 2013
Let-Go Hanford Whistleblower: 'My Career is Dead'
In early November, a federal appeals court will consider the case of a well-known Hanford whistleblower. Walter Tamosaitis argues his career was essentially killed after he voiced safety concerns at the nuclear cleanup site.
Earlier this month, the high-level manager was laid off for good. It wasn’t retaliation according to the federal contractor that employed him. But U.S. senators and watchdog groups fear this turn will make other workers with safety concerns clam up.
Tamosaitis has had, as he puts it, a lot of stomach acid these past couple of weeks.
“I’ve gained a bunch of weight, because I tend to eat when I’m nervous and worried,” Tamosaitis said.
He says he’s had good days and bad days since he was escorted out the door two weeks ago. On a recent day as we sat down to talk in his formal dining room, his mood was turning melancholy.
“… I went to the mail and I read the information from the unemployment office of fill this out, and send this in and apply for three jobs per week,” he said. “And then reality sets in of, ‘ Holy smokes, I’ve been laid-off and I’m unemployed.’ And your emotions drop like an anchor through the water.”
It’s been about three years since Tamosaitis went public with his claim that the massive nuclear treatment plant now under construction at Hanford might not be robust or safe enough. That factory is intended to bind up radioactive sludge into more-stable glass logs.
His concerns, and those of others, spurred several independent federal investigations. They validated several large technical problems with the $12 billion nuclear waste treatment plant. But Tamosaitis says none of that ultimately saved his job or his future.
“My career is dead,” he said.
Tamosaitis’ former employer, URS, gives a different account. The company was unwilling to go into details about his layoff after four decades of service. In a written statement, it implied it was not punitive; the company said Tamosaitis was caught up in downsizing due to tight budgets.
URS emphasized that it “encourages its employees to raise any concerns about safety, which remains the company’s highest priority.”
The latest developments prompted U.S. Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., to write to the secretary of energy. Wyden says the whistleblower’s fall sends the wrong message when Hanford needs a turnaround.
“The very fact that this doctor is in court, shows that the safety culture system is broken,” Wyden said. “The fact that he was fired just days after the secretary of energy personally pledged to make sure that the department had a safety culture that encouraged employees to come forward confirms that it is broken.”
Seattle-based Hanford watchdog Tom Carpenter wants to know how the public will know that Hanford’s plant is safe if workers closest to the action are afraid to bring up problems they see?
“It doesn’t matter what you say to people. You can say, ‘Oh we want to hear your concerns.’ But if you slap them down every time, they’re going to watch for the slap, not the words,” Carpenter said.
Tamosaitis has two pending lawsuits against the Department of Energy and two of its contractors, Bechtel and URS. The lawsuits, now at the appeal stage, allege whistleblower retaliation and wrongful demotion. In both cases, the trial courts ruled against Tamosaitis’ claims.
This month, URS offered Tamosaitis 26 weeks of severance pay if he drops all legal wrangling against his former employer. Tamosaitis says it would be ethically and morally wrong to accept.