Podcasts & RSS Feeds
Most Active Stories
- UW's MOOC On Public Speaking Proving To Be Massively Popular
- Seattle Business Owners: $15 Minimum Wage Could Prove 'Possibly Fatal'
- UW Professor Traces Growing Income Gap To The Collapse Of Organized Labor
- How To Make Your Own Crème Fraîche — And Why You Should
- No Need To Presoak Beans For This Cheese Rind-Flavored Minestrone Recipe
News & Music Contributors
Tue February 15, 2011
New revelations heat up Longview coal port fight
Previously undisclosed documents are raising questions about whether the Australian company trying to build a new coal export facility in Longview has tried to snooker local officials.
According to an article in the New York Times, documents show officials at Millennium Bulk Terminals “tried to limit what state officials knew about its long-term goals during the early permitting process last year.”
The company’s application says the facility could export up to 5 million tons of coal a year. But the record shows the company hoped to quickly scale up to as much as 60 tons annually.
"Too sensitive a juncture ..."
Opponents of the project are jumping on the revelations to say Millennium, an offshoot of Ambre Energy of Australia, is deliberately trying to pull the wool over the eyes of permitting officials. They point to one memo in which a company official warns, ““We are [at] too sensitive a juncture to raise the plans to build a second berth. The community is small and the risk to the current permit path is too large.”
In a press release, the coalition of community and environmental groups opposing the coal export terminal says:
“The documents clearly show that the companies hid the full scope of the project in hopes that county and state officials would quickly approve the smaller piece of the project, and that they consciously planned to wait until several months after they had permits in hand before revealing the rest of their … plan.”
The company says it was just exploring possible ideas for future expansion that it didn’t plan to pursue in the near future.
“I can’t put a really nice face on what he said,” Millennium chief exec Joe Cannon told the New York Times. “This is like an engineer talking to other engineers about this strange new process in the state of Washington.”
Officials at the Washington Department of Ecology say the new information has “raised eyebrows” at the agency, but will withhold judgment as it reviews the entire project.