Podcasts & RSS Feeds
Most Active Stories
- Listen: Can You Pick Out The Northwest Accent? (And Yes, We Have One!)
- Former Boeing Executive Alan Mulally’s Advice On Labor: 'Working Together Works’
- Tips On Staying Healthy While You Travel
- Mass: Expect Intensifying Rains With Global Warming
- Just Back From Spain, Nancy Leson Offers A Few Pointers On Paella
News & Music Contributors
Tue April 15, 2014
TurboTax Maker Linked To Fight Against 'Return-Free' Tax System
Originally published on Tue April 15, 2014 10:33 am
Proposals to let U.S. taxpayers get a statement from the government that's already filled in with their financial information have been under attack by Intuit, the maker of TurboTax, according to ProPublica. The nonprofit newsroom says several people took a stand against the proposal in a grass-roots campaign that Intuit orchestrated.
The proposed "return-free" system would simplify the filing process by using information the federal government receives from banks and employers. It's used in parts of Europe and in a California pilot program. Critics warn, though, that such a system might ignore tax credits and incorporate errors. And tax preparation companies such as Intuit say it would hurt their business.
The ProPublica article is by Liz Day, who also wrote about the campaign against return-free filing last year. She says she looked into the campaign after noticing "remarkably similar language" being used to weigh in on a "remarkably obscure topic."
In a Morning Edition interview last year, Day gave some context about the proposed system:
"President Ronald Reagan supported it and talked favorably about it in 1985. And President Obama has spoken also favorably about it on the campaign trail in 2007. The idea is that you would get a pre-filled return from the government, using the information they already have, to send a pre-filled return to you that you could either accept or throw away. It's completely voluntary."
The opponents found by ProPublica represent a diverse group, from a mayor and other community leaders to an NAACP official and a rabbi. In each case, they were approached by acquaintances with ties to either a trade group that includes Intuit or to lobbyists.
Here's one of those stories, about a rabbi who wrote an opinion piece attacking the proposal:
"Rabbi Dorff says he was approached by a former student, Emily Pflaster, who sent him details and asked him to write an op-ed alerting the Jewish community to the threat.
"What Pflaster did not tell him is that she works for a PR and lobbying firm with connections to Intuit, the maker of best-selling tax software TurboTax.
" 'I wish she would have told me that,' Dorff told ProPublica."
Responding to ProPublica's story, Intuit says that it supports "taxpayer empowerment."
"Return Free minimizes the taxpayers' voice and instead maximizes revenue collection for government," company spokeswoman Julie Miller wrote. "That kind of anti-consumer policy does not advance taxpayer rights."
Clarifying its editorial stance, ProPublica says its quibble with Intuit isn't necessarily with the firm's fight against changing the U.S. tax system. The site quotes Eric Umansky, who worked with Day on the story:
" 'There's nothing necessarily wrong with the idea' of targeting community leaders and local influencers on a cause — 'grasstopping,' in industry lingo — 'if you are transparent, and giving accurate information, both of which were not the case in multiple instances.' "