Podcasts & RSS Feeds
Most Active Stories
- Listen: Can You Pick Out The Northwest Accent? (And Yes, We Have One!)
- Former Boeing Executive Alan Mulally’s Advice On Labor: 'Working Together Works’
- Tips On Staying Healthy While You Travel
- Mass: Expect Intensifying Rains With Global Warming
- Just Back From Spain, Nancy Leson Offers A Few Pointers On Paella
News & Music Contributors
Fri June 13, 2014
Washington Supreme Court Orders ‘State’ To Contempt Hearing In McCleary Case
A frustrated Washington Supreme Court appears ready to hold state officials in contempt.
The high court late Thursday ordered the “state” to appear at a hearing in September to address the lack of a plan to fully fund basic education.
The court’s highly unusual move follows a 2012 ruling that the state isn’t meeting its constitutional obligation to school children.
The language in the order is stark: “…the State is hereby summoned to appear before the Supreme Court to address why the State should not be held in contempt.” It’s signed by Chief Justice Barbara Madsen. She’s clearly frustrated that on April 30 lawmakers missed a deadline to provide the court a completed plan to fully fund basic education by 2018.
“We’ve made a little bit of progress, but not a huge amount and that’s what the court is upset about,” said Rep. Ross Hunter, D-Medina.
Hunter, who chairs the House budget committee, says he doesn’t blame the court.
“They should continue to push us, and I believe that they are going to continue to do it. I think that they should do it in a way that’s practical,” he said.
By “practical,” Hunter means keeping the focus on what’s best for kids.
The court, in its order, indicates that everything is on the table including monetary fines, prohibiting the Legislature from spending money on non-education items and even ordering the state to sell property to fund schools.
The contempt hearing is scheduled for Sept. 3.
Youth & Education